Saw this video come up on my youtube feed and the picture right away got me thinking. If a horse in the wild doesn’t have it’s hooves trimmed or naturally worn away then could the prints it leaves be mistaken for Bigfoot prints? Especially the “muddy” prints. The weight of the horse would explain the force made with them and their long legs would explain the stride (ignoring the extra two legs).
Does this make sense that this could be a false flag for some Bigfoot prints that are out there. I’ve seen a few that would fit this theory but I’m not pointing any fingers.